Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://41.63.8.17:80/jspui/handle/123456789/72
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSakyi, Kwesi Atta-
dc.contributor.authorMweshi, Geoffrey Kapasa-
dc.contributor.authorMusona, David-
dc.contributor.authorTayali, Esnart Mwaba-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T13:10:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-16T13:10:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-23-
dc.identifier.citationKwesi Atta Sakyi, Esnart Mwaba Tayali, Godffrey Kapasa Mweshi, David Musona. Negotiating Employee Contracts Case Study Review Negotiations and Conflict Resolution. Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 8, No. 3, 2020, pp. 139-145. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.201200803.14en_US
dc.identifier.issn2331-0715-
dc.identifier.urihttp://41.63.8.17:80/jspui/handle/123456789/72-
dc.description.abstractThis paper is a review of a case study in human resource management with a slant towards the legal aspect of contract of employment and renegotiation of contracts. As none of the authors is a lawyer, the paper is reviewed from the managerial rather than from the legal point of view. Cindy is the lady employee in question who worked for a company for many years and never thought that a time would come when her employer would transfer her to a far off and forlorn place in the midst of nowhere. Her relocation puts her off and she thought she had been unfairly treated by her employer. In the analysis of the issues at stake in the scenario, the authors came to the conclusion that both Cindy and her employers had merit in their case should they go to court for adjudication and pronouncement of a verdict. Cindy on her part did not follow due process at the onset to ask questions about her job. It seemed also that her employers on their part did not do full disclosure about the nature of the job and the need to relocate staff when necessary. The authors decided to use the exploratory approach methodology in this case study review as there was not much information in the scenario to go by. The case study method has been found to be a suitable method of research that enables a phenomenon to be examined closely at a micro level so that knowledge from a small sample can be extended to cover generalizations of all similar cases, using the deductive and inductive approaches. Therefore the authors made some assumptions and used the deductive and inductive approach to arrive at logical conclusions. This article is therefore a narrative article and a commentary that does not include any primary research material. Readers are free to come to their own conclusions on the merit of the case as the main objective of the authors of this article is to generate knowledge for academic discourse. Human Resource practitioners and theoreticians will hopefully find the article stimulating food for thought and pertinent to their work.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Human Resource Managementen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries;8(3)-
dc.subjectContract Re-negotiationen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectPsychological Contracten_US
dc.subjectSources of Poweren_US
dc.subjectEmployment Contracten_US
dc.subjectNegotiationsen_US
dc.subjectFull Disclosureen_US
dc.subjectEmployer-Employee Relationsen_US
dc.subjectAttributes of Valid Contracten_US
dc.titleNegotiating Employee Contracts Case Study Review Negotiations and Conflict Resolutionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Papers and Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.11648.j.jhrm.201200803.14.pdf424.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.